Published In Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology Issue Spring, 2012 Issue Number 2 Volume 13 Related Grant Managing Incidental Findings and Research Results in Genomic Biobanks and Archives Symposium Articles The Role of Law in the Debate over Return of Research Results and Incidental Findings: The Challenge of Developing Law for Translational Science Returning Individual Research Results: What Role Should People’s Preferences Play? Deidentification and Reidentification in Returning Individual Findings from Biobank and Secondary Research: Regulatory Challenges and Models for Management Incidental Findings in Genetic Research: A Vexing Challenge for Community Consent Returning Genetic Research Results: Considerations for Existing No-Return and Future Biobanks Enforcing the Rights of Human Sources to Informed Consent and Disclosures of Incidental Findings from Biobanks and Researchers: State Mechanisms in Light of Broad Regulatory Failure Perspective on Biorepository Return of Results and Incidental Findings The Informed Cohort Oversight Board: From Values to Architecture The Tension Between Policy and Practice in Returning Research Results and Incidental Findings in Genomic Biobank Research